thoughts.fromthecoconut.sky

my darling Saturn

2007-04-03T11:04:00.000+07:00

Hello my beauty
you spin and sail slowly
with your paper-thin rings in silence.
Everything in its place
eon ofter eon.
In your one slow pass around the sun
I have been born and grown to thirty.

One of your moons has lakes and weather.
Another spews water into space.
Your rings of pebbles are beyond art.
Tiny shephard moons keep the ring-beauty in place.
I could go on and on.
About dazzling beauty.
About baffling mystery.

But here on Earth,
We've got other things to worry about.
How to pay the bills,
and well basically, how to pay the bills.

And so science is what we see on TV.
Crafted and contrived by the feudal priest-lords.

Science is explained by past heroes.
Past heroes
who were somehow fearless enough
to dare to be curious.

Those were different times.

Now it's all figured out.

And so.
Saturn has a hexagon at its north pole.
A hexagon floating in the clouds as storms swirl around it.
We can send ships to Mars and back
but can't imagine how to do that:
how to float a hexagon in stormy clouds.

The photograph of the century. CNN et al, seemed not to care. Far from bolting upright in their seats like I did, the scientific community offered up not a peep. In a week the photo and story were buried in banality.

A fabulous, unexplainable image is beamed back to Earth, from a craft sent to find the unknown, and no one is even curious? Hail victory to the powers that be. The powers that be assuming for themselves more and more of free peoples' power.

But I do not accept this defeat.

My darling Saturn, queen of the deep, born as I was on Saturday, I am amazed by you.
In ages hence, a free people may come to care how you can make a hexagon stand in your clouds. Until then, forgive them because they are too damn busy worrying about how to get by in one of the richest places on this rich, rich planet.

I am not defeated.
I look out, far above the castles of the petty feudal lords, and I am amazed at what I do not know. Yet I know that it is of the same stuff as me. A hexagon standing in your stormy clouds. Indeed.

I stared at you tonight through hazy city skies.
In thanks.

a hexagon on saturn!

2007-04-02T21:53:00.000+07:00

There's a hexagon on the north pole of Saturn.
I repeat, there is a hexagon, in the clouds of Saturn. Bigger than our whole planet. This awesome thing has been there for at least 25 years. A perfect hexagon in the clouds. How do you do that?

I'm stunned and in awe and my ponder muscle has hit the wall, and is still going...

Why does no one else seem to care.
What happened to curiosity?

I mean really! Why aren't scientists jumping up and down in front of TV cameras and insisting on missions to Saturn...with HAL...

What happened to us?

There is a hexagon in the clouds on the north pole of Saturn!
(thank god it's not a pentagon)
A hexagon in the clouds on the north pole of the sixth planet. Arthur C Clark where are you now? Where have all the scientists gone?

my anniversary

2007-04-02T09:37:00.000+07:00

I grew up in a stable American family. We moved many times to various suburbias. I was a good student with good grades, therefore it seemed to me that I had a good grasp on things.

In the summer after my junior year at college (mechanical engineering, honor student) I went to Europe with a student tour/thing. I have never been the same.

My world view was thrust back in my face. My world view was the American standard, a two dimensional cut-out from a happy meal. Confronted with a greater, more subtle, more interesting reality, it was clear that I was stupid. I didn’t like that. And I wanted to know what I didn’t know.

So I made a plan.

I would finish university, get a job, pay back my loans, save money, and leave America. A one way ticket. And don’t come back for at least one year.

I set myself a date, five years in the future, fixing it in my stubborn mind. On that date I would leave my American life, and go see something else. I prepared myself with German and French classes, art history, architecture, and stuff like that.

And on my target date, I left my friends, a glorious girlfriend (truly glorious), and my American life. (I still bleed a little from those wounds.)

April 1, 1987.

Twenty years ago. (holy shit! twenty years.)

It’s been quite a ride.

dangerously joyous

2007-04-02T09:15:00.000+07:00

Beyond my computer screen
birds are singing in the morning sun
singing because they can, I suppose
singing because it’s morning and not yet too hot.
Already I have the fan on
blowing steadily in my direction.
Dang,
our fat red dog
is snoring
cicadas are droning
and someone is moving pots around
downstairs in the kitchen.
There is a secret joy in my belly.
I feel loose and dreamy, like the day in me has not yet woken.
I am glad without knowing why
I feel strange,
dangerously joyous
too aware that I am alive.

Global warming is not what I'm afraid of

2007-03-31T11:35:00.000+07:00

Is burning fossil fuels the number one cause of global warming? Dunno. Not really sure at all, because, frankly, there is a lot of stuff going on on the planet. Ms Earth has a nasty habit of warming and cooling, all by herself.

Is global warming the number one danger civilization is facing? I say no way Jose. I say the most clear and present danger is the current capitalist, corporate fascism. Just my opinion. But since you’re here, I’ll tell you why.

One. The present corporate-capitalism is a borg-like machine with one purpose: move money up. Forests are only valuable to this machine when they are broken into pieces and sold. Humans only valuable for their labor-production-profit capacity or the money that can be taken from their pockets. Tigers are valued by the pelt or zoo revenue. To the borg, society is a means to pump money up into high pockets. Nothing else. The borg cannot smell or eat grandma’s cookies, but it can brand and market and distribute them. The present borg system disrespects nature. Nature is invisible to it. So is society. So are you. So am I. It cannot see us. It cannot see grandma and children, nor smell evening flowers or savor the scent of your lover's neck. Instead it is programmed and empowered to consume and pump money.

And so, this one problem, this inability to value anything other than money, causes a world of hurt: poverty, pollution, junk food, dead whales. It's a long list.

So go ahead, control co2 emissions all you want. And while you’re pouring resources into that enormously difficult task, the borg will be busily breaking into pieces and selling even more of what is left of this lovely planet and human society. And we may well wake up in a feudal-corporate wasteland with perfectly controlled co2. With sea levels and weather still wandering around.

Two. Humans are robust and tough and have found ways to thrive in:

burning romantic deserts,
mucky inbred swamps,
hysterical fertile crescents,
high altitude picturesque mountains,
tiny beautiful islands with coconut skies,
anaconda/jaguar/ayahouska jungles,
freezing arctic seasides,
Calcutta,
the outback,
and American suburbia for godsake.

We’re cool, creative, survivors all right. We can thrive anywhere!

But (when the seas rise and storms come and weather patterns change) civilization could fall! (screams from off-stage).

You mean the civilization where whoever has the most money has therefore the power of law and force behind them to kick the shit out of everyone else and do whatever they please? That civilization might fall? Hope so. I’ll gladly throw some banana peels in its path. I’m sick of that one. Earth-life is literally sick of that one.

But real civilization, the one that’s been pushed to the side of late, where thinking, compassionate, mature humans look at the nature of the situation around them, and with their family, friends, and natural extended community, do their best to find ways to live happy, creative, exciting, challenging, non-destructive lives…well that one I think has a long, glorious (bumpy) future ahead of it.

Sorry, but global warming isn’t scaring me. Life is change. Don’t like change? Too bad you weren’t born a rock. Erosion denial.

But (when the seas rise and storms come and weather patterns change) global warming will change everything! (screams from offstage)

Everything has always been changing. To think that things stay the same is delusional. Weather patterns change. Continents move for godsake. Go with the flow a bit. Please?

We cannot keep sea levels stable, any more than we can stop the tides, or make every day a sunny spring nymphfest. There are seashells in the Rocky Mountains, and not so long ago the Sahara Desert was a pretty nice place to live. This is a planet of change. Check out this graph of sea level changes over the past half a million years or so:
(from: Eustatic sea level during past interglacials)
You recon you can smooth that baby out by controlling carbon emissions? (And if you averaged out the swings, sea level would be maybe fifty meters lower than now...and that means, well, a lot of glaciers up north. Looking at the graph, we seem to be near a peak.)

Before the next conference on global warming, I want everyone present to take a deep breath and say: ‘Nature is always changing. We can’t keep nature from changing. I accept that Nature changes. I am happy to be a part of Nature. I am happy to meet any and all changes whatever they may be. I will do my best not to be an asshole to the other lifeforms on this planet.(repeat last sentence two more times)’

Sea level has never been constant. To whine about it is kind of dumb. To say that if we control co2 emissions then sea level and weather will be stable is even more dumb.
Nature has never been stable because she is evolving. So are we. She's not about a steady state, fixed stars, Dantian reality micromanaged into the dust. She's out there on the edge. Honest and clean. Taking reality as it comes.

I'm happy to live with that.
Are you?

I say the number one problem is the borg.
We need to face the borg. Inject it with an appreciation it now lacks. Or kill it if it can't be turned to serve earth-life.

pushing money

2007-03-30T22:11:00.000+07:00

On Bill Maher the other day, David Frum said something to the effect of “they hate us when we intervene, they hate us when we don’t intervene. They hate us when we support the dictator, they hate us when we oppose the dictator.” He sort of threw up his hands, as if those people won’t like us no matter what we do.

Is Mr Frum saying, his 'think tank' has found an entire population, grandmas to nephews, that won’t be reasonable? An entire population of perpetually unreasonable people?

Good research guys.

I’ve got a much, much, simpler idea:

US foreign policy is relentlessly, financially self-serving to big money interests, even when exceedingly cruel to the local people.

Simple.

So instead of finding a perpetually unreasonable society, we’ve found a foreign policy with a perpetual goal: push money, by war, by words, by forked tongue policy, into the pockets of the few. Push money to the top.

Am I moving too fast for you Mr Frum?

Money to the top. Never mind the blood. It's not theirs.

sick of meds 2

2007-03-28T09:47:00.000+07:00

From health-care-reform.net:

(An excerpt from an article by Kah Ying Choo)

By citing these statistics, Starfield (2000) [see post below for reference] highlights the need to examine the type of health care provided to the U.S. population. The traditional medical paradigm that emphasizes the use of prescription medicine and medical treatment has not only failed to improve the health of Americans, but also led to the decline in the overall well-being of Americans. Starfield’s (2000) comparison of the medical systems of Japan and the U.S. captures the fundamental differences in the treatment approach. Unlike the U.S., Japan has the healthiest population among the industrialized nations. Instead of relying on sophisticated technology and professional personnel for medical treatment as in the U.S., Japan uses its technology solely for diagnostic purposes. Furthermore, in Japan, family members, rather than hospital staff, are involved in caring for the patients.

The success of the Japanese medical system testifies to the dire need for Americans to alter their philosophical approach towards health and treatment. In the blind reliance on drugs, surgery, technology and medical establishments, the American medical system has inflicted more harm than good on the U.S. population.

sick of meds

2007-03-28T08:49:00.000+07:00

In the year 2000, a study from Johns Hopkins estimated 225,000 people (minimum), died of iatrogenic causes in US hospitals. That is, the deaths were caused by the healer. The third leading cause of death nationwide. The deaths broke down as follows:

7,000 - medication errors in hospitals
12,000 - unnecessary surgery
20,000 - other errors in hospitals
80,000 - infections in hospitals
106,000 - non-error, negative effects of drugs

(Source: Dr. Barbara Starfield of Johns Hopkins School of Hygiene and Public Health, Journal of the American Medical Association, July 2000)

I have a lot of contact with doctors and nurses (I work with them daily on their English to prepare them to work and study abroad.), so I know that they are human, and under stress, and that the system is never perfect, and so accidents will happen. So at first blush I see nothing insidious with the medication errors, other errors, and infections. Unfortunate though they are, and worthy of every effort to be reduced, well, we all make mistakes.

Unnecessary surgery however, strikes me as different. Surgery is invasiveness in the extreme and should be a last resort. That 12,000 people died as a result of surgeries which were unnecessary in the first place is shocking to me. How many were merely maimed, disabled, traumatized, or caused to suffer - along with family and loved ones? Why push for surgery? My guess: money. Here in Thailand, companies providing prosthetic joints and implants have teams of talented people competing to win over surgeons to their product lines. Inducements include significant pocket money on every unit used, pampered treatment and perks, getting docs laid, holiday seminars at desirable locations, visibility and status.

This leads to the biggest number on the list: 106,000 - non-error, negative effects of drugs. These are non-error deaths caused by medication. The doctor prescribed the proper medication according to present accepted guidelines. The nurses administered the medications according to present accepted guidelines. The patients complied. Non-error. No mistake. 106,000 (minimum) dead per year. Look like something is wrong with our present accepted guidelines? It does to me. My guess: pharmaceutical money.

Here in Thailand big pharmaceutical companies regularly treat doctors and their families to vacation/seminars in Europe, America, or 5-star Thai beach resorts. The more the pharmCo likes you, the better the perk. But all doctors get the perks. All doctors. It's standard operating procedure. Entire hospitals can even be 'branded' to a 'family' of meds, receiving in return both individual and hospital-level kickbacks. Shifting to a cheaper, better, safer brand - or even using less can become socially impossible. These are the same pharm companies at work drumming up business in the US.

Oh, and here's a link to a Mind Hacks article about hot chicks selling pharmaceuticals.

But don't worry. America has the FDA to protect them with safe meds and guidelines, right? Sorry my son but you're too late in asking, Mr GalaxoSmithKline's pharm train done hauled it away.

Ike was right

2007-03-28T07:22:00.000+07:00

I've just re-read Eisenhower's parting words as President. Wow. America could use a leader like that again. I highly recommend reading the whole speech.

You can find it here.

Some excerpts:

Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic programs to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion in basic and applied research -- these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.
But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs -- balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage -- balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.

and,

Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time. As we peer into society's future, we -- you and I, and our government -- must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.

and,

Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be instead, a proud confederation of mutual trust and respect.

Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.
Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative.

and finally,

To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America's prayerful and continuing aspiration:

We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.

We have indeed fallen from a great height.

BBC, Iraq, and me

2007-03-27T14:23:00.000+07:00

I just finished watching the March 15 show of BBC's Question Time, where a high powered panel and intelligent and diverse audience members discussed the Iraq situation for one hour. My impressions:

How that level of discourse (in terms of time, level of participants, intelligence of discussion) just doesn't happen on American TV.
How intelligent and mature the audience members members seemed to be. Though many different views were represented, it remained civil.
The same impression I have whenever I see or read something from John Bolton. The man is an evil turd. And I type that in a calm, civil tone.
That what I feel is a key point was only mentioned briefly, and not directly addressed. That point being that the US was instrumental in bringing Sadaam to power, keeping him in power, encouraging and supporting his war with Iran, and deafening in it's silence when he was gassing various enemies. It's ludicrous to assume that suddenly we are acting from the moral high-ground. We couldn't be trusted then, so we shouldn't be trusted now.
That no one mentioned the wanton destruction of all of the ministries. I mean, if Iraqi self governance and stability was a goal, that's a pretty dumb thing to do. However, if instability is your goal, it's a pretty effective action.
That no one mentioned the (4 or 5 I think) huge permanent bases, and largest embassy on planet Earth. But, the turd Bolton slimily spouted that no one wants the troops there any longer than is absolutely necessary. When the Iraqi's stand up...blah blah blah.
That it was said that soon Iraqis would create laws allowing them for the first time to share in the wealth of Iraqi oil. That struck me as rather odd. Isn't that like saying that you can share in your bank account? If it's their oil, it's their oil, all of it, and it's their decision as whether to share it with others or not.
Several spoke, in a frightening way (to me), that when the UN doesn't go our way, with countries like Russia, France, and China jamming up the Security Council, that it's something like a moral imperative to act to stop evil. As when China invaded Tibet, or as they could invade Taiwan? As when Sadaam invaded Kuwait which he blamed for stealing Iraqi oil via slant drilling? As with Russia attacking Afghanistan? Are we now saying that those are all reasonable, morally justified actions? If not, why not?
Thank goodness for the internet, that I can access such info.

Thai style

2007-03-20T20:54:00.000+07:00

(I wrote this a few years ago as a way to introduce American host families to two high school Thai exchange students. My students. I know the kids and the families well. - Years ago, when I first came to Thailand, I said, Thailand has a lot to teach the world. I still stand behind those words. So here are some of those ideas, which I wrote to help my Thai students have a smooth reception in the land of America.)

Thais are cool, and think that life should be enjoyed. Enjoyed properly – in a sweet, smooth, innocent and fresh way.

Thais intuit very well what is right and wrong
and they care about that.

They care about right and wrong.

They care about their own actions being right or wrong.

Love and commitment to their parents is absolute.

The Thai family is a rock.
A beautiful rock.

Respect for elders and teachers is automatic – and for the most part genuine.

Elder and parental advise is truly taken to heart. (Advise carefully. Talk from the heart, a Thai kid will hear.)

Thais understand goodness quite well (check me on this, please) and aggression, for them, is almost always negative - even when they show aggression themselves.

Seriousness is considered negative, as it lacks softness and joy.

Thais aren’t interested in changing another’s idea.
Other’s ideas and actions are the responsibility of the others.
Other ideas aren’t a threat.

Thais like to share the moments of life with other people. Being alone is usually a bummer. Open kindness is easy for Thais, as is forgiveness and laughter.

They are very comfortable in the now-moment. And uncomfortable out of it.

Jokes are expected. Fun is always welcome, and considered valuable and important.

Thais want to be awake with loved ones and friends, properly enjoying the now-moment, laughing and smiling, even through the difficult times. That’s the good life.

Thai physics

2007-03-19T09:35:00.000+07:00

I drive down the little lane on my little motorbike. A dog lying in the road gets up and looks at me in a bad way. I sputter onwards. An old woman carrying a heavy load emerges from a sidestreet – like she didn’t even see me coming, or like she didn’t even care. I hit the brakes. I notice my sour mood getting more sour. A cute little girl in her little school uniform looks at me like I’m dangerous.

I stop.
I put both feet on the ground.

I say to myself.
Go with joy, or don’t go at all.

I breathe deeply.
It takes a while.

I feel joy return.

I feel joy return.
To my mind.
To my body.
I feel it shine in me.

I sputter onwards.
The dogs in the road part to let me pass.
Children smile.
Lights turn green.

Another Thai lesson.

How corporations kill

2007-03-18T18:57:00.000+07:00

What makes a corporation evil?

I think that really is the question that cracks it all open. Let's turn it around: Why should corporations be good? Well, it seems that there is no inherent reason for them to 'be good' or 'do what is best for society' whatsoever. None. However if the people who direct the corporation wish to do good, they are at liberty to do so, provided that they do not violate the prime directive: maximize the return for the stockholders. So, no reason to do good, legal mandate to increase profits.

The system used to evaluate profits is blind to environmental and social destruction. So clear-cutting forests makes corporate sense. As does dumping pollution anywhere you can. The world environment and society have no value in the corporate reckoning system, so they simply are not counted. Such atrocities don't make it into the ledger.

Thus, with nothing inclining them towards the good, and absolutely no reason to care about the environment or human welfare, but a clear and legal prime directive pushing them to maximize return, what should we expect? Add to that mix a set of driven, smart, CEO types, who have perhaps convinced themselves that what increases the bottom line is inherently good, and you have a recipe for a very efficient organization whose actions could be massively destructive.

No megalomaniacal evil genius at the helm.

But destruction, exploitation, and all kinds of bad stuff.

These kinds of men built tens of thousands of nuclear warheads. Sleeping soundly in their beds at night.

I remember from my days at Martin Marietta (now Martin Lockheed) a cool, family guy, softball coach, project manager who had a big laser photo (remember those?) framed as the center piece of his office. It showed MX missile warheads returning to Earth through the cloud cover, like a family of falling stars. He was a nice guy, a family man, and he loved that picture. And if they would have been mere meteorites, it would have been beautiful. But it wasn't. They were dummy nuclear warheads. He put that picture in front of his desk, so every time he looked up, he saw it. Why? Because his work made those warheads fly so precisely. He was one of the nicest guys I met during my time there. I liked him very much.

He was proud of his work.
I was new enough to be sickened with dread.

Iraq: a two front money scheme

2007-03-17T16:34:00.000+07:00

The simple reason that the W company (a front company) sent the American military to shock and awe Iraq is the old story. Old as the hills. Treasure. To steal treasure. Again. From the poor to the rich. Again. Yawn.

But this war has a modern twist. In Roman times money came from the booty of war. But W company isn’t so interested in stealing treasure from the vanquished – Iraqis were rather poor after years of brutal sanctions. And not to steal oil, though that’s a nice side dish. No, one of the great reasons for ‘going in’ was to take money from the US Treasury; to take money from the US treasure and put it into a few carefully positioned pockets. And the time and energy they take to position their pockets is truly amazing. Would that they could channel such intensity towards happy ends, but alas, I digress.

The American army no longer cooks for itself, nor washes its own clothes, nor builds its own camps, nor supplies it’s soldiers with means of calling home. KBR (Kellog, Brown and Root, a Halliburton possession, for newcomers to world events) does that at dectuple the price, thank you very much. See the documentaries Iraq for Sale, or The War Tapes for enough gory details to make you sick. Meals to the troops get billed out at $29, laundry $99 a load, and locally made cola $6 a six-pack. KBR bills by the plate whether there is food on it or not, and by the truck-journey, whether there is anything in it or not. They can even demand that US soldiers protect their investments. Good work if you can get it. And if the vice prez happens to be your former CEO, get it you can. Without even the process of bidding, and all that competition nonsense.

And then of course there’s all the material. The bullets, the humvees, the trucks, the smart bombs, the fuel. War consumes like crazy. Look around. Every company who sells these consumables is a ‘patriotic’ supporter of the war. Their stock is up. Patriotic bumperstickers fill their parking lots. “I support ~~my paycheck~~ the troops”.

A few years ago, via Riverbend blog (a heroic Iraqi), I read about an Iraqi engineering company, in the early, ideological days of the ‘reconstruction’, that bid on the repair of a bridge. They lost. The contract went to a US company, at ten times their bid.

What ended up getting constructed were permanent military bases, and the biggest embassy on the planet – a new, neocon Vatican.

America is in a money fever. Our army is on the other side of the world. The fever has gotten down to our roots.

We’ve started yet another war to pump money into pockets. Looks like over 700,000 Iraqis have died as a result. Don’t talk about them. Kids in Iraq can’t go to school and are growing up in a nightmare scenario. Don’t talk about them. The money is flowing as designed. Americans are getting poorer and working harder just to stay afloat. Don’t talk about them. The money is flowing as designed, from our normal pockets into some rich CEO's, and in the process is massive suffering and death.

The constitution lays out the mechanisms by which we control this beast called government. We have not used those mechanisms. The death toll has been enormous. Our karma.

Instant karma, because make no mistake my friends, this is a two front war: Iraq and America. The people behind W company know that the American people are their greatest threat. The Patriot act was no mistake.

Torture is legal; free speech is not.

Our primary torture base has a cute nickname, gitmo.

A two front war. Both countries are in mortal danger. And the money guys look in the camera and say ‘stay the course’.

This fever is at our cultural roots now. What are we going to do?

I want a new god.

2007-03-15T21:57:00.000+07:00

The recent rise of atheist rebuttal to the monotheist monoliths has been interesting for me. So here's some of my thoughts on this God thing:

There seems to be confusion about what a universe without ‘God’ would look like, act like, value, be worth, and be worth living in. Well that then begs a better look at ‘the God question’ doesn’t it?

0. Can I personally communicate with God?

1. Is God an individual, with a personality and emotions and human foibles such as jealousy and anger?

2. Is God the only way towards Good?

3. How can we have ethics without God, when your good and my good may be different?

4. Who made the universe (a), its rules (b), and all the complex stuff in it (c)?

Let’s start with the number 4 and work our way backwards.

4. A three-part loaded question. Why presuppose a who?

a) We just don’t know how the universe got here. We may have our beliefs, theories, and opinions, but we can’t know.

b) The rules of the universe – tautologically beautiful and reliable – are also of unknown origin. These two questions (a and b) are fascinating to me in terms of metaphysics, but are not the stuff of rational debate between persons of opposing views.

c) As for the complex stuff in the universe, well, here rationality begins to find some traction. Given that we have a universe with basic stuff and rules, how do we get to the sublime reaches of human experience? Good question. I’m more than willing to entertain ideas that go beyond the rational, as long as they fit well with the evidence around me; but since this is a topic I can ponder utilizing my reason, a belief-only answer ain’t gonna satisfy me.

3. Sure we can have ethics without the concept of ‘God’. The concepts of pain, joy, health, suffering, wholesomeness, unwholesomeness, wisdom, and ignorance require no deity to fathom. All humans naturally understand these. The range of human experience is a natural and rigorous base for ethics.

2. I would say that motion towards the positive cluster: the joy, health, wholesomeness and wisdom can be confidently called ‘good’. And the opposites not good. In addition many of the actions ascribed to deities in various holy books have been anything but what a reasonable person would consider ‘good.’ Thus, not only don’t I see a deity a necessary to define good, I see deity often used as something that confuses the whole concept of good.

1. As we develop as individuals we hopefully rise above the blinding rushes of emotion such as jealousy and anger. Therefore I cannot ascribe these qualities in any way to a ‘supreme being’.

0. Great question. I would imagine that each of us must answer this one for themselves.

For me, if there is a God, that really did create all this stuff from the quantum fluctuation to galaxies, time, thought and memory, dinosaurs and pi, falling apples and the smile on a child's face, then that is just one outrageously cool, fantastic entity. I can't see an entity like that either interested in punishing or aching for worship...which is maybe just me seeing what I want to see, because worshiping a punisher was never much fun. For me.

Grandma's funeral

2007-03-14T23:43:00.000+07:00

I just got done talking with my mom, dad, brother, nephew, and cousin via skype. God bless the internet and God bless skype. The ceremony will start at 2am my time. Two hours from now. My cousin, Jamie will speak. She just read me what she's going to say. It's perfect. It's more than perfect. We laughed and cried together as she read it for me over this blessed internet phone. My mom's going to laugh/cry like crazy.
As it should be.

thoughts turn waves to things

2007-03-14T13:02:00.000+07:00

It's always fun to think about how thoughts cause thingless wavefields to condense/precipitate into things (isn't it?).

It's kind of like everything just is, waves and being and the Tao and the neverending nowmoment, and then one of us, me for example, has to look at it and say with a (probably repetitive) internal thought "oh, I see, that's a ___". And then, that group of wave energies that I 'saw' collapse into something labeled ___ , and continue on their perfect journey, tying the waves and me and ___ together. (for a long time, I guess)

I try to be careful about what I think. But not sucking at it, sometimes, is a challenge.

the commons and the FED

2007-03-14T12:06:00.000+07:00

thoughts: the commons is the missing component in capitalism. Introduce a valued commons, placed under the protection of a trust, and banes of capitalism will be checked and the benefits remain. Please check out The Commons Rising from the Tomales Bay Institute.

thoughts: The FED (the US central bank) must go. It does not 'dampen' the swings of the 'business cycle', it creates them out of whole cloth. That's right: it doesn't guide us through the vicissitudes of a fluctuating market - it creates the risings and fallings to pump money into a select few pockets. That is its raison d'etre.
It was designed by rich bankers and is in violation to the constitution. It is not under government oversight, cannot be audited, and is controlled by private individuals who reap vast profits while contributing nothing to society. It's fractional lending system devalues the money in our pocket - an effective tax. It is the third (or fourth?) central bank in US history. The previous ones were shut down by an outraged public. Jefferson would not tolerate a central bank. It is by no means axiomatic that a central bank is either necessary or desirable for a nation. (check for yourself)
This is a core issue behind the question of "What's wrong in America?'.

Goodbye Grandma

2007-03-11T22:02:00.000+07:00

My grandmother died yesterday. She was the coolest grandmother. She was tough. Different. Kind. And a different kind of tough. Giving and open. Not vulnerable. Sensible squared. Absolutely consistent. Even at 94, she was a better speller than me. Martha Lehti: Awesome woman, job well done. My mother is your daughter.

the rat

2007-03-11T19:10:00.000+07:00

There's a rat in me kitchen what am I gonna do?
There's a rat in me kitchen what am I gonna do?

Last night while I was sleeping, I caught a rat.
Not a mouse. A rat.

And don't worry. I lean severely in the Buddhist direction, so I caught him/her alive and well. See, here in Thailand you can pick up a cruelty-free rat trap at any local market for about a buck. It's a screen-metal box, the size of a loaf of bread, with a lid at one of the ends, that can be set to slam shut when the rat has entered far enough into the trap. So you hang a little bait, position the trap, and in the morning you have a caged rat.

See, in my old house, we had a cat. Or rather, we had use of a cat, that was making use of us. The cat hung around, got fed, could stay out of the rain; and as this cat, Fang, had helped raise our two dogs from puppies, he had established a sanctuary of food and safety in a dog studded environment, without incurring (no pun intended) any obligation on his part. Yes, that old house was rat free. Any rat foolish enough to mosey around the our compost heap soon had its head or other body parts laid before us as booty for the Master, or, equally as often, the entire wolfed-down body would be up-chucked somewhere. Yum.

Fair enough. Nature solved our problems. And cleaning up occasional piles of slimy undigested rat chunks was a fair price. And half the time, Somjit (my wife), did it anyway.

Yet this world is always changing. And to even lowly, lovely Chiang Mai, comes the crush of money and fashion and stuff. We moved just before the Starbucks opened at the end of our soi (a soi is a little lane off a bigger street). Our peaceful area had become trendy. The Champs Elysees of Chiang Mai. Got more expensive too. Took us too long to cross the road. But I've digressed to far.

Last night I caught not just a rat but that rat.

See, when we moved, Fang didn't come with us. He was already getting on, and he just shifted off to another gig. We missed him and the way he used to let our youngest dog beat him up with a tolerance that I will never forget- to a point where a blurry flurry of cat-claws stopped the game.

So, that left us with two dogs, which quickly became three. But dogs, I now know for sure, are no threats to rats. And our new, quite old, house had hollow spaces in the walls and ceilings - rat-ways, built right in. We missed Fang right away.

And so for the first time I learned about these great Thai rat traps. I set one up, and the next morning I had the little bugger. He was pissing and shitting in fear, but totally unharmed, so I placed the cage-trap in the basket of my motor scooter and scooted about a kilometer and a half or so away to an open field, opened the cage and let the terrified little critter run. And run he did. God, they're fast. I had no idea. But I had given it a new lease on it's little life and I proudly puttered home on the motorbike pleased with the ease and humanity of the process to be greeted with a chorus "A kilometer and a half?! Are you crazy? That's not far enough. Have you seen how fast they run?" A monk even told me: "Your house is perfect for him. A kilometer and a half? He'll be back for dinner."

I was thrown into doubt. That little guy really had shocked me with his speed. I mean, they bound like antelope.

So soon after we had another rat. Same rat or not was hard to tell. But again I caught him/her, put the cage in the scooter basket and went about three long kilometers, across a canal and a highway to drop him/her off. Seemed like overkill to me.

I got yelled at again.

See living with rats is not just an abstract distaste. If you leave a few chips in the bottom of the bag, in the morning the bag is gone. To be found a few days later wedged behind the bookcase, plastic shreds and ratshit all around. You have to close off all food. We did.

It ate our soap. I kid you not. It gnawed on the edges of the bars, and carried some full-sized bars completely away. It dragged a bag of dried Thai chilli up into the rafters towards its lair, no doubt, somewhere in rat-highway, but alas for the rat, the bag broke, showering dried chili pepper all over our kitchen. Ate through aluminum foil bags of coffee too.

An now another rat was heard scurrying along the rat highways of our home.

I set up the cage/trap. But nothing happened.
Somjit's dad was visiting at the time and said that rats can smell the old trap. (Which meant that he was sure that I had not sent the old rat far enough away, and now it was back, smarter than ever. My bad again.) He cleaned the cage well, and set the trap. Nothing.

We waited a while. Covering food, hiding soap, and hoping hunger would drive the little jerk off.

Oh, by the way, do you know, rats are noisy? Not just their little scurrying, which is more like galomping, through the rafters, no, more than that, they chirp and call and cry and make all sorts of noise. Noise that our three dogs don't seem to take any notice of.

I set up the cage again. Nothing.

I moved it to a new place, outside our bedroom window, on a little ledge; it was a move out of character, and I got him.
This time I took no chances and went more than four kilometers away down twisty turny roads that none of you could fine your way back from. Across the canal. Across a highway. I returned home, feeling the hero, to be greeted by shaking heads.

By now you may have guessed it. This new rat seemed to know all my tricks. I set the trap with all my cunning. Nothing worked. But life wasn't so bad. We sort of resigned ourselves to live with ratness. We kept our food locked away - no bananas on the counters, no unopened bags of coffee, chili, or cookies - kept the soap in a tupperware jar. It begins to seem normal after a while. We might have been able to coexist. Just the taunt of rat galomping through the rafters, and of course the weird rat chirps and calls.

The rat diminished my manhood. No doubt.

I was ready to let it slide.

But he wanted more. He ate through the mobile phone recharger cable, which I had to jury rig with electrical tape to keep it all together. Then he did it again. Why? Just to piss us off? In the end all will be revealed. Next he started chewing new holes through the teakwood floor into our bedroom (How do you like that? An old, cheap house, with thick teakwood floors. Kinda bends the imagination.). And he taunted us with a half-chewed electric cable. The threat of fire loomed.

By now your realizing that I'm pretty much a slacker.
Judge me as you may. I believe I'm flexible with other species.

I set up the trap again last night. And I set it good.
Somjit rolled her lovely brown eyes.
I filled the cage with scraps of paper, cloaked in rubbish, and basically made it look like a trash heap. I scattered tissues and crumpled paper around. I lined the inside of the trap with paper - my students old math homework - so that the trap was not so clear amongst the mess. I did breathing exercises. I visualised rat-joy. I scattered little bread crumbs, little orange junkfood snacks bits. It was a mess.

The rat's urge for garbage sites was too much, and the door slammed shut leaving him/her in a pile on junkfood and math homework, and my manhood incrementally increased.

This Sunday morning I woke to such joy of the capture. I thumped my chest, and before the rest of this lazy house awoke, I took him five and a half kilometers away, leaving him at a carefully chosen spot, an area awash in cheap pondside restaurants and food scraps. Hell, I'd rather live there. I didn't see a single cat. Just a bunch of dogs. And we know how much a threat they are.

Only one regret.
Should've marked an 'x' on his/her nasty forehead. I thought about it and all, but it's not so easy to do as the toothy little hyperactive fellow is bounding nonstop in the cage through math homework, junkfood, and rat shit, warming up for a long run. And after all, it was Sunday morning.

the keyboard screen

2006-12-30T11:01:00.000+07:00

The Keyboard screen

Coconuts

Babies ready to fall

Hang in my sky for weeks

Out past my laptop screen.

Roosters crow

constantly

perhaps confused by lights at night.

Voices of friends chattering on motorscooters

rise and fall as they sweep past

my fixed position.

I think of you.

snowstorms now and then

2006-12-23T18:38:00.000+07:00

My folks had planned to fly to Reno to spend Christmas with my brother and his family, but Colorado weather intervened, and they were snowbound bigtime. A storm that comes once every ten or so years. I called on skype to make sure they were ok, and had a long talk this morning. They are well, and the govt system seemed to work well: three feet of snow across the state, no deaths; a day later the streets are plowed and they can make it to safeway - alas, no bananas.
I told them Chiang Mai was about 48 degrees (9 C) - and they laughed a that's-not-winter' laugh. Then I asked them what their thermostat was set to, and they said, about 70. Well, when it's 48 in Chiang Mai, it's 48 inside and out. In the bathroom, and the kitchen. Our house has an electric water heater for the shower, which at these temps, just takes the bite out of the cold. So go take a cool shower in 48 degree weather, and then tell me you ain't cold. They saw the difference.

Another such storm occurred on Christmas eve, when I was still a young buck living at home. My dad and I drove across denver in our 1969 Ford stationwagon - swimmingpool green - to pick up my stubbornly independent 88 year-old granny, who everyone called Granny. We got there, and got stranded. Blowing snow got under the hood and into the distributer cap; dad showed me what happened. The city declared an emergency and forbade traffic. We were rule followers. And now there are no more distributer caps. And my mom spent that Christmas morning alone. The next day I carried Granny like my new bride through hip deep snow to our trusty stationwagon, with a dry distributer cap, for the careful journey across town to home. The emergency had lifted, and the sky was blue as I lifted that small amazing woman who was born in New York in 1892 and went to Easter Sunday services in a horse and buggy through the unbroken snow in front of her condo. My Granny. I was a young buck, but I'm not a big guy, and even though she was as small fragile woman, it was hard for me to keep her above the deep snow. It's a memory that I am proud of. Dad drove us good, and got us home safe. My dad, the fighter pilot.

first post

2006-12-22T15:06:00.000+07:00

And so, on the first Friday afternoon after the winter solstice, in the sixth year of the plague of bush, I became a blogger.

karma book

2005-07-01T15:52:00.000+07:00

Karma for Today's Traveler

A small book that I worked on with an extraordinary Thai monk, Phra Bhasakorn Bavilai. His approach to explaining karma and the basic framework of Buddhism is new and fresh. He has created quite a stir here in Thailand with his new way of explaining the timeless teachings of Buddhism. Several years ago he wrote up his approach in a Thai book which was quite popular - though it did cause a bit of controversy, as new ideas will. But the content has been vetted at some of the highest levels of Thai Buddhism and academia, and his approach seems to help clear up a lot of concepts for people.

We worked on this English version for over two years, rewriting his ideas from scratch for a Western reader unfamiliar with the topic. Many Thai people who had read the Thai version eagerly awaited the English version, and donated money to print 62,000 books (thus far) to be distributed freely.

If you come to Thailand, don't be surprised if you find one in your hotel or guest house, like you might find a Gideon's Bible. If you come up to Chiang Mai you can pick up a copy at Wat Suan Dok, at their Monk Chat program. Soon (hopefully) an international version should be available. When it is, I'll post a link.

One of his basic concepts is to view the karmic situation as it relates to our inner mental world, and our outer worldly environment, separately. For example, donating money to a good cause would be looked at as:

worldly - the amount of change, the size of the ripples you make, on your external world depends on how much you give, and how good the cause is.
mentally - the amount of change, the size of the ripples you make, on your internal world depends on the quality and power of your intention in the giving.

If you're interested in such things, or are looking for an introduction to Buddhism, I recon, though I am of course rather biased, the book an interesting read.

9-11 skeptic indeed

2005-06-05T12:44:00.000+07:00

This is an email I sent to Scientific American, a magazine I have subscribed to for many years, about the Skeptic column dealing with 9-11. I got no response.

To Sciam:

I had to laugh a bitter laugh at Mr Shermer’s last column. We have entered Alice in Wonderland when a column called “Skeptic” is not at all skeptical about physical facts. A column that agrees with official explanation absolutely – even though there was no scientific inquiry to produce such explanation.

Sorry friend. A real skeptic would be puzzled by facts that don’t align with common sense. Facts that should at least cause one to ponder.
Such as why:

for the first time anywhere on the planet, three (not two – have you forgotten WTC 7?) steel framed buildings collapsed into their own footprints due to “fire” even though the fires had already been contained. Thick black smoke indicates an oxygen-poor fire, a relatively cool fire.
the fire fighters (who should know) were not in anyway worried about the integrity of the building, after all, the steel was certified to withstand 2000 degrees Fahrenheit for two hours.
people were seen standing in the hole created by the impact of the airplane – indicating that even at the point of impact the fire was not quite an “inferno.”
the recent Madrid fire – a real inferno – resulted in a burnt out steel structure – no collapse.
no explanation has been offered as to what caused the massive concrete core of the building to self-pulverize (and self pulverize it did – the huge concrete core above the point of impact turned to dust – instead of falling like monolith)
there are first hand accounts of blasts being heard
there was a hot spot under the rubble days after the collapse
there were seismic recordings indicating blasts immediately preceding collapse
there was no forensic study of the debris,
the debris was shipped out of the country with whirlwind efficiency
no one mentions the fact that the WTC buildings were sold several months before the attack.
almost no airplane parts were found at the Pentagon
the film from several security cameras in the Pentagon area covering the approach of the airplane were all confiscated with great efficiency and none have seen the light of day.
a bunch of the “hijackers” are still alive
none of the “hijackers” were on the flight manifests
“fanatical Muslims” visited strip joints just before their martyrdom.
a group of Israelis were arrested, and then quickly released, after being seen high-fiving and cheering as they watched the towers fall, standing on their van, in New Jersey. The van was from a dubious company, they had several different European passports, they had $4,700 stuffed into a sock.
after many countries’ security services warned the US, our leaders lied and said they had no warning (These warnings spoke of planes used as weapons, targets would be symbols of American power, some mentioned New York, some mentioned early September – these were foreigners warning us. Surely our own security services must have come up with something too.).
no planes were able to intercept the airliners even though the ones scrambled from Otis AFB could have (they were airborne early enough, and had they flown at top speed they would have changed history).
none of our “representatives” cares, or is upset, or thinks it odd, that a military that costs $1.1 billion per day, could not send up a single plane to confront these lumbering airliners
no heads have rolled as a result of the colossal security failure
the secret service people allowed GWB to sit in a public location while America was under attack
GWB sat doing nothing while America was under attack
the hundreds of pages of the Patriot Act (so Orwellian a name, no?) was pre-written and ready to go, and pushed through congress before the mysterious heat beneath the trade centers had even cooled. (who wrote it, and for what purpose, and under whose authority?)
the Pennsylvania crash (like the Pentagon crash) resembles no other crash site. The Pennsylvania crash was a barren hole in the ground, again, as in the Pentagon, missing the pieces of the plane.
so little effort was expended to investigate what happened. (More funding was given to Clinton’s Whitewater probe than 9-11.)

Sorry dude, but you ain’t skeptical. You are a faith-based writer. Government (handlers) right / Facts ignored.

How about changing the name of your column to: “The Current Dogma Speaks,” “Status Quo Rules,” “From the Heavenly Gates of Government Science Come my Reasonable Answers.”

At least it would be honest.

Rise up!

2004-01-01T10:02:00.000+07:00

Rise up! is an antiwar song I wrote in the run-up to the second Iraq war. The intro clip is from an antiwar protest in Washington a month or two before the invasion. I don't know who the guy speaking is, but he is great.

Rise up, rise up, rise up.
They say it's to protect you
while they try to dispossess you
of the right to decide between wrong or right
to openly discuss what politicians hide.
They want to keep their secret plans from the public eye
we got to keep our fires burning keep our spirits bright.
We got to rise up, rise up, rise up.

Rise up people against the war!

Money's got no children
and bombs ain't for building
and killing ain't no way to make a peaceful day
as all of God's children can easily explain.
We got to keep our fires burning keep our spirits bright
stand up and speak for what we know is right.
We got to rise up, rise up, rise up.

Rise up people against the war!

-I see days ahead
-kiss my children into bed
-all across the planet I
-see that everything is fine!

Rise up people against the war!

We've got the power and the will and
we'll do it for our children
put the warmongers and the corporate whores
in the history books with the dinosaurs.
I claim my power!
I claim my rights!
And no dirty tricks are gonna change my mind.
I'm gonna rise up, rise up, rise up.

Rise up people against the war!

The Positive Chi Units:
me on choppy guitar and vocals
Case Rienstra (Amsterdam) on pretty guitar and extra vocals
Simon Blechynden (Western Australia) on didgeridoo and extra vocals

9-11 notes

2001-09-11T10:19:00.000+07:00

9-11

1990s PNAC (Project for a New American Century, for those of you new to world events) lays out a plan. Radical aggressive foreign policy, transformation of military, huge military spending, invasion of Iraq (regardless of Sadam’s presence), string of bases across central Asia, decades-long war on several fronts. Laments that this brilliant plan for American world dominance will proceed slowly unless there is a “Pearl Harbor event”.

2001 Bush comes to office and forms his team. A ‘war team’, as identified by many observers at the time. The team is dominated by PNAC members.

At a G8 meeting in Milan, Bush lodges on US Navy ships due to a security concern that planes may be used as missiles to attack his hotel.

Bush orders investigators to back-off on Osama.

Govt ignores warnings from field agents about strange foreign pilots.

Govt ignores CIA warnings about terrorism and Osama.

May 2001. The asbestos laden world trade centers are sold (for the first time) to Silverstein who has them heavily insured against terrorist attack. Google asbestos and Cheney.

Aug/Sept 2001 Govt ignores warnings from many countries’ intelligence agencies (Russia, Israel, France, Germany among them) that America is about to be hit. The agencies mention hijacks, planes, symbols of American power, New York, early Sept.

Early Sept 2001. Put options on United Airlines, American Airlines are wildly out of norm. Investors are betting these stocks will take a dive. CIA routinely monitors the stock market for exactly such behavior. CIA takes no action. (Put options are later traced to a German bank once headed by a former CIA director.)

9-11 Itself

None of the hijackers appear on any of the published manifests of the four flights. No pseudonyms are mentioned, no explanation given.

One of the leaders of the hijackers is reported to be a playboy, a partier, a cocaine user, and visited a strip bar the night before the big day. Strange behavior for a religious martyr. Other hijackers have are reported to have similar, un-Islamic behavior.

All of the hijacked planes fly around the sky diverting wildly from their intended targets. They don’t just fly directly to their targets. No explanation given.

Only two planes are scrambled, eventually (It seems). Yet reporting on this has been muddled, unclear, with reports and timelines varying. The timelines out in the early weeks after 9-11 indicate that the two planes from Otis airbase had plenty of time to reach NY before the 2^nd hit. Some reports say they flew at top speed and couldn’t get there in time. Other reports said that they were sent in the wrong direction. Most reports are vague and muddled and avoid addressing the timeline question at all. Why is this not clearly laid out?

The outrageous delay in reacting to the attack is blamed on confusion, miscommunication between agencies, not knowing what to do in such a novel situation, and much later, the fact that many training exercises involving hijacked planes (scheduled for that day?) confused the air traffic controllers; and those mock hijacking drills had repositioned fighters to other parts of the country. Yet, again the timeline has varied between reports of who knew what when, and who did what when. The 9-11 commission report is also internally inconsistent with its timeline. And hijacking have precise protocols which are clear and routinely practiced. These protocols it seems were not followed. No one has been punished. And it strikes me as odd, that training for terrorist attacks is the excuse given for the poor response.

Strange behavior of Rumsfeld. Reported to have been in his office completely unaware of the unfolding events until long into the drama. Seems to me a good reason to fire the Secretary of Defense.

Strange behavior from Bush. Conflicting accounts (again), but seems that he had news of the first impact on his way to the Florida school. Then when reading ~~like~~ with the kids Andrew Card whispers in his ear, reportedly telling him of the second impact and that ‘America is under attack.’ Bush sits there long, agonizing minutes, some reports have him there 20 more minutes! OK. One. Good reason to fire a President – sitting around while the country is under attack.

Two. If the country is under attack, why didn’t the secret service whisk him away?

Three. Later Bush talks about watching the first plane hit and thinking ‘what a bad pilot.’ Gasp.

3a. There was no early footage of the first plane (Unless Bush saw something in his car on the way to the school. If that’s the case it shows a govt right on top of things and then the delayed responses make no sense.).

3b. Maybe he is confusing the second impact with the first. But he didn’t see the second impact until after Andrew Card told him America was under attack. So his thought bubble makes no contextual sense.

3c. An airliner filled with your countrymen slams into one of the great symbols of your county, also filled with your countrymen, at obviously great loss of life, and he thinks ‘What a bad pilot’?! Another good reason to fire him, and never let him play with your children.

The building collapse is questionable on many fronts.

· Steel-frame buildings have never before collapsed from fire anywhere in the world. Even after huge, hot, long-lasting fires which completely gutted the structure.

· The fires were less hot and long-lasting than many, many other fires in steel-frame buildings, none of which collapsed.

· The firefighters’ tapes show that none of them were questioning the integrity of the building. Some of the tapes indicate a situation on its way to coming under control.

· In one photo a person can be seen standing in the hole made by the airplane – indicating that at the impact site, the fire had died down.

· The buildings were billowing dark smoke – indications of a cool fire.

· All three buildings pancake perfectly into their own footprints.

· All three buildings fall at nearly freefall speed. This is impossible if a sequential failure and pancaking of floors is to blame for their collapse, because the lower floors would be caused to fail due to the impact of the falling upper floors. This impact decreases the momentum of the falling floors, slowing the descent.

· The pancaking floor theory says the metal fixing the floors to the concrete columns and external steel ribs weakened due to heat. The floors thus slipped. So, what caused the external steel ribs and concrete columns (47 of them) in the center of the building to fail? The concrete columns should have remained. But they turned to dust somehow.

· The pancaking theory says that the floors had to fail more or less evenly around the external and internal circumferences where they were supported. With the asymmetrical fires this seems highly unlikely. Also, video shot during the fires shows no floor sagging, and no buckling of the steel ribbing. All the video evidence shows the buildings holding up perfectly, as designed, until the sudden collapses.

· Some have claimed that the impacts critically damaged the entire structures. However, engineering analysis of the wobbling antenna at the top of the building indicates that the structure supporting it was uncompromised. Basically, the way the antenna wobbled showed that the structure was firm.

· There were many first-hand reports of blasts in the basements of the buildings. Debris from below-ground blasts gutted the lobby of one of the towers. There were many reports of blasts from firefighters and witnesses. These were reported live on all the networks, then slowly this information seemed to drop away from the collective memory.

· The collapses look exactly like controlled demolitions.

· The metal columns were nearly all broken into 30 foot pieces.

· The concrete columns were gone. Pulverized.

· (Miraculously one of the hijacker’s passports survives the blaze. (Ahem) So, if he was traveling under his real name, why wasn’t he on the manifest?)

· The top of one of the towers initially topples to the side, but instead of falling like a decapitated monolith, this top section too is pulverized to dust.

· A BYU physics professor claims to have found thermate (a chemical used to slice through steel) in samples of trade center metal.

· Seismographic data show large events prior to the collapses.

· Seismographic data show large events prior to the collapses.

· Seismographic data show large events prior to the collapses.

· Molten pools of metal remained deep beneath the rubble of all three buildings for weeks after the event. What’s up with that? There was a whole bunch of gold in the basement. A whole bunch of gold. Where is it?

· Contrary to law, the evidence from the crime scene, the debris, was quickly and extremely efficiently removed (and shipped to china) without careful analysis. This was done over the protests of fire engineers who were only allowed a cursory, photo-op walk through of the debris. What was the hurry?

· WT7, a 42 storey steel-framed building, collapsed into its footprint, after a medium-sized fire on several floors of one side. It was not hit by any plane. Buildings between it and the towers remained standing. At the time of collapse, there was not even much smoke. Silverstein later recalled how he gave the order ‘to pull’ the building. So they evacuated all the people and firefighters, set up a safety perimeter, and then watched it spontaneously, collapse, right on time, into its own footprint. Miracles on top of miracles. WT7 housed the CIA emergency response headquarters. Molten steel was also found beneath the rubble days after the event.

Umm. How do you decide to let a building collapse? How do you know, that from this smallish fire, the third steel-framed building in history is about to spontaneously collapse into its own footprint? Notice, he didn’t say ‘We thought it was unsafe and might collapse so we evacuated everyone.’ No. He said that he decided ‘to pull it.’ And then it fell down.

A demolition takes weeks to set up. And for the first time in history, a steel-framed building fell on cue. Amazing.

The Pentagon

Several security cameras were in place to film the impact. Video from many cameras was confiscated. No clear video has been produced. Why not?

Many people reported seeing or hearing what they described as a missile, or a commuter-type jet.

The plane supposedly made an extremely rapid descent and corkscrew turn, leveled off just above the ground, crossed a road clipping some light posts, skimmed three or four feet above the Pentagon lawn (leaving it unscathed), and then slammed into the building. Nice bit of flying that.

The wake of air turbulence didn’t seem to have the effect it usually does on things like cars on the road.

The entire body of the airplane, wings, and massive tough engines, all vanished into a single hole in the stone building. The engines, massive heavy things, are too far out on the wings to fit in the hole. Where did they go?

One piece of twisted aluminum, about the size of a car door, was photographed sitting alone on the lawn and sited as evidence of the ‘wreckage’.

Claims are that the plane disintegrated and vaporized on impact. Yet they claim to have recovered DNA samples from all the passengers. DNA is more indestructible than jet engines?

Then suddenly, after such shocking ineptitude. The hijackers are all identified, tied to Osama, and the PNAC plan swings into high gear.

What about the Bush family connections to the Bin Ladins?

What about the $100,000 wired from Pakistani intelligence to Mohamed Atta?

What about various govt officials who were warned not to fly that day, or during that period?

What about the fact that we’ve never seen the names behind the put options?

What about comments from the govt that ‘no one anticipated using planes as missiles’? It’s clearly a lie. The French govt had recently foiled an attack on the Eiffel Tower using planes as missiles. GWB changed his sleeping arrangements in Milan because of planes as missiles. The govt had analyzed and even drilled to prepare for the event. Then why did they lie?

What about the fact that the Florida flight school where some of the hijackers trained has strong and dirty CIA connections?

And, oh by the way, who’s the governor of Florida?